To: luis a. garcia who wrote (2391 ) 1/5/1998 9:07:00 AM From: donald sew Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2615
Luis, I am fully in agreement with Sean. You mentioned that you don't sense everyone else perceiving the same urgency - I am part of a group of people who have invested in it. The majority of them are all scientists who also feel very strong about the technology. We all have concerns that the price will drop further. I still have some shares in it, but my overall position is slightly up, but all of my friends are severely down still. And yes, another reverse split is of concern to them, and we are not talking about a few shares either. I dont keep track of the different recent posters on this thread, but I assume that there are not as many as previously, so making a conclusion on the number of negative comments on this thread may not be all that accurate, if that is how you came to that comment. I am not here to bash the stock, but for myself - I am trying to determine the bottom so I can get back in. I do feel that the potential of this technology is strong as my friends do. If someone can convince me that this is the bottom with facts not with images of strong future potential, I would get back in. Here are some signs I will be looking for which may hint that we are at the bottom: Steady and higher volume Insider buying Firm base formation Spikes in price to the upside-such should show interest. Luis, we all know too well the potential that this company has. That is not what is in question. My question is where is the bottom. We have already seen that the strong potential of this company is not pushing the price of this stock up at this time. We need management to come out with firm fundamentals and smart decisions. It was a very bad decision to do the reverse split at tax-selling season. Seeya