Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (979096)	11/5/2016 1:55:41 PM
From: James Seagrove	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1578288

Melania is so cute? I don't want Bill Clinton as First Lady.

To: koan who wrote (979096)	11/5/2016 1:58:20 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1578288

the dems created the inequality they need a under class depended on the gov so they will vote dem that's why they are letting millions of uneducated mexicans in so they won't be able to get a high paying jobs and thus depend on gov hand outs. What the dems do is evil and it's just so their elites can stay in power. you have to be totally brainwashed not to see it. it's not compassion it's evil

To: koan who wrote (979096)	11/5/2016 8:45:48 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By Stock Puppy Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578288

This can be substantiated by the fact that the United States is somewhere between 45th and 65th in the world in income inequality. The term "substantiated" apparently has an unclear meaning to you. Where the US is in "income inequality" does not substantiate, in any way, shape or form that income inequality is a problem. The US is among the highest average wealth countries in the world. One of the highest middle class lower bounds in wealth. One of the highest median wealth figures in the world. Most importantly, what the US has that Switzerland and others don't have is opportunity. You can live in one those countries and say to yourself, "I'll never be filthy rich, but government will take care of me." In the US, we say, "We have a 'safety net' if we can't make it, but in the US I have a chance to be anything I'm willing to be." And that is a fact. Poor people succeed (Barack Obama, Ben Carson). Poor people can get by if they don't choose to succeed. So, your claim is that "income inequality substantiates income inequality". I say that is nonsense and, just to put it clearly, totally stupid. So, do you really have a point to make?