Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (979269)	11/6/2016 2:02:56 AM
From: Sdgla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576826

You do not have facts or truths so you decide with what ? You and koan cannot offer any facts that prove Hilda is the best person for the job and I have listed plenty of facts supporting Trump as the best man for the position. You do not even have a grasp of what the job entails. Truly you both represent the definition of stupid : Stupid \| Definition of Stupid by Merriam-Webster Merriam-Webster › dictionary › stupid Full Definition of stupid. 1a : slow of mind : obtuseb : given to unintelligent decisions or acts : acting in an unintelligent or careless mannerc : lacking intelligence or reason. Just the sad facts.

To: RMF who wrote (979269)	11/6/2016 2:20:08 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576826

I'm not into trying to tell people how to vote. But I do try to understand it. How does someone support Hillary Clinton knowing that she is under investigation by the FBI? Knowing that she has disregarded the essential principles of protecting the national interest? Knowing the lying sack of crap she is? Knowing she and the DNC hired people to foment violence at Trump rallies? I don't know how you overlook all this stuff. I understand being a liberal or a conservative, whatever. But where do you draw the line. When I know there is a strong probability of political corruption, my personal political views go to the end of the line. I lived through Watergate, and I don't really care what Carl Bertstein says -- a Cabinet official selling foreign governments access to US government officials is a level of corruption that blows away anything that happened during Watergate. How do you look away to that?