SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mel Boreham who wrote (42136)1/3/1998 12:37:00 PM
From: Kashish King  Respond to of 58324
 
You are the straight man in a new comedy team.

If that's in reference to the dozen or so exchanges yesterday I think that was pretty obvious. I did start out with a serious but casual quality observation based on personal experience. It wasn't the bulls foaming at the mouth but comments like if you continue to refuse to answer my question it will reflect on your credibility, as to whether or not I was long or short. Obviously the naive and intrusive nature of that question took me aback. I guess that guy never stopped to think that a) that was none of his business, b) there was no possible way to verify such a claim, c) a person could be long with puts or perhaps short with calls. In other words, it was a stupid question and sadly, typical of this thread. Obviously the reputation is warranted, but there are certainly thousands of legitimate and reasoned investors trading IOM. Some of them do it because it's like shooting fish in a barrel where naive buffoons are the fish. I have traded IOM myself at times. Good fishing Mel!



To: Mel Boreham who wrote (42136)1/3/1998 2:38:00 PM
From: FuzzFace  Respond to of 58324
 
Mel, that was another classic. Please repost it on the humor thread, as well as the link to the original. Some day we will want to go down memory lane and need that link to jump into the thick of what it is all about. Thanks for the great laugh.