Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Uranium Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (9)	1/3/1998 6:39:00 PM
From: Terry J. Crebs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30140

Great thread idea Bcb, and Marcos' URL's are great. Thanx. I'm very long on USEG--mainly because I was in on Anaconda's Green Mountain WY discovery in the mid '70's and hope to live long enough to see it become a mine someday. Grades of up to 3% eU3O8 and decent volumes (I recollect volumes of +25 million pounds) at depths beneath 600 metres. I also did some in-situ work (late '70's) mainly in the Live Oak and Beeville areas of Texas. I was not too impressed then with the in-situ technology (it was IMNSHO "hyped" even then as eco-friendly), but our recoveries were not very good and the project was only marginally economic. Miocene shale beds above/below the U-mineralization did not "seal" as well as hoped, and un-anticipated down-to-coast "growth-faulting" caused my geologists and chemical engineers to swear a lot <grin>. Hopefully, URIX has solved most of the in situ problems which plagued us in S. Texas. Good Luck, T.