SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (317660)11/10/2016 10:49:20 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 540708
 
Pardon her for what crimes, exactly? For the fictitious crimes that the RW has continually made up over the years?

She has a lot of money and will have a lot of time on her hands. If they really do "investigate" her or charge her, IMHO she should just fight it. THERE WERE NO CRIMES that anyone has ever proven. There is only constant repetition that there are/were crimes. It is ridiculous. If she fights and shows these people as the assholes that they are, she will be doing a public service. If she is "pardoned" for unspecified "crimes", then people will continue to presume that she is guilty of [whatever they fantasize, fill in the blank].

It is as insane as Trump was at various times when he claimed things that were demonstrable false (like when he totally misrepresented what Obama was saying to the crowd that was booing a protester).



To: bentway who wrote (317660)11/11/2016 9:10:18 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 540708
 
>>Pardon her for what crimes, exactly? For the fictitious crimes that the RW has continually made up over the years?<<

Yes, THOSE crimes. The RW base is expecting it. He may have promised to do so on the stump. A pardon would show he's a compassionate Caesar, while acknowledging the crimes. Also, Obama, for his 'crimes'.