Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (32610)	1/3/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 55532

Pugs, I guess you have an agenda and choose to ignore pertinent posts referring to this matter. Whatever. Forte' apparently no longer works for MSU. MSU is still attempting to market its innovative CD controller chip with no major success. They have marketed their Slipstream architecture to Zilog (ZLG). The equivalent would be for RMCW/RMIL to market their bottled water to Pepsi/Coca-Cola. Haven't seen that happen yet either. And you know something else?? MSU was my first experience with a company that constantly promised to have their financials out "in just a couple more months". It took them over 1 1/2 years to finally respond. I was constantly egging them on about becoming a fully reporting company. I don't see you posting anything negative about RMIL... Why is that? A true shareholder would be concerned with all facets of their investment, not merely with the idea of short-squeeze that may or may not occur. Btw, who informed you and Riley that there was a major short position in RMIL in the first place?? Would there be any justifiable reason for doubting the reliability of this information given the analysis of the past 4 months?? Has this promised "distributorship deal" between you and RMIL management, clouded your objectivity?? Could it be construed as a case of "future favors" that might justify your continued attacks on Naysayers and your apparent complete disregard for fundamentals? Not insinuating anything... Just would like your official statement on the possible theories described above. Regards, Ron

To: Pugs who wrote (32610)	1/3/1998 2:24:00 PM
From: Rich_1	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs, you are absolutely right about this thread looking more and more like IOMEGA just before the major upward movement with its stock. The Neys representing the SHORTERs were out in full force all day, all night, and all weekend long in an attempt to break up the short squeeze. None of us has asked them to buy this stock. They are on a paid-for mission which explains why they have no other life. Even lincensed stock broker Kugler is willing to to risk his career by trying to get us to sell over the internet. By the way Pugs, great DD in proving that SMartin and stock broker Kugler tend work together with their attempts to tank other stocks close to their short squeeze. Also, did either of them bother to answer your repeated questions to them about why they immediatedly stopped posting on other theads as soon as the result of their short squeezes were apparent? I guess that means with their constant presence here it suggests that the short squeeze with RMIL is alive and well. Rich_1