SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Why the markets will continue higher... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (332)1/3/1998 12:41:00 PM
From: Kapusta Kid  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 745
 
To : GROUND ZERO et al re Andrew's Pitchfork

After browsing some of the posts on AP, it strikes me as strongly reminiscent of Don Fisher's Dynamic Gann Levels. Don posts daily on misc.invest.technical over on the Newsgroups. I think his email is < ganntrader@aol.com > but I wouldn't swear to it.

His methodology can be implemented using a spread sheet, but is most easily done with WAVE WI$E, a spreadsheet/charting program with built-in DGL functions. You click on the top and bottoms and the bisecting lines are drawn for you and more. I am not advertising this stuff. But there does seem to be an interest on this thread....Pete



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (332)1/3/1998 4:57:00 PM
From: Cage Rattler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 745
 
GZ:

How does one post one from Excel? I have no clue. I guess I could send a copy to a third party -- I have transmitted them to chip as email attachments.

I do note the S&P has busted above my tine line and my soggy leap Puts are getting hung out to dry. Thank the lord they are circa '99 -- that was my yacht money; guess I'll be sailing a snow shovel instead. ;-)

I never knew there was so much depth to, nor so much iterest in, the Fibonacci theory. I did some searching and they have groups from art, music, math, and the stock market -- there is even a magazine published quarterly. Golden Ratio (8/5, 1.6..., etc.), on a math-related site, is accurately aproximated = (1 + SQRT(5))/2 . So what?

Ciao, Ted