Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bonefish who wrote (981173)	11/12/2016 4:29:05 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577543

And the economics means whatever the replacement is will look very much like Obamacare if you keep the no pre-existing conditions. Granted, in wingnut world, economics is powered by unicorns and fairy dust. When you don't have to implement actual policy, you can just make shit up. When you do have to actually do the work, then you have to recognize reality or you watch things gurgle down the drain. Like in Kansas, Louisiana and several other states that have tried to implement wingnut economics.

To: Bonefish who wrote (981173)	11/12/2016 4:37:22 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577543

Keeping minor options doesn't make it like amending the ACA. The fines, mandatory enrollment etc is the greater problem. The demand that all policies cover what is unnecessary to many is also an expensive waste. Opening up to competition around the country is needed. People who don't want medical insurance should not be forced to purchase it. Crazy libs are straining to make it appear as though Republicans are copying Obama. They are unhinged on so many issues. They cannot admit to themselves that their echo chamber is what lost the election for them.