SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott Norteman who wrote (42168)1/3/1998 1:48:00 PM
From: Kashish King  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Obviously I knew that having lurked for more that a year, Scott. Hopefully you aren't suggesting that I would embarrass myself by not knowing the sex of all participants. That's important knowledge and I would be remiss not to have it despite the oftentimes ambiguous or deliberately deceptive and whimsical handles people use. Clearly anyone with a feminine sounding handle must be a female, my choice of a masculine pronoun was simply a test, and I am happy to say you passed. BTW Scott, there are several pseudohermaphrodites on this thread. Can you name them?



To: Scott Norteman who wrote (42168)1/3/1998 2:02:00 PM
From: KM  Respond to of 58324
 
Scott: Thanks for defending my honor. Darrell accused me of being a "he" too, at one point, and he had been talking to me for months! I figured the "ette" on the end of my moniker was a dead giveaway, but you never know!

Great TA post yesterday, by the way. It made me get things back in perspective. Thanks.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News