Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (982008)	11/15/2016 7:12:10 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570744

>>>"Do you believe in science?" Believe in? No. I respect the scientific method of observing, recording and reporting on its findings and I am grateful for the advances that have made modern society what it is. Belief implies a level of certainty that science can not legitimately claim. Genuine scientists are humble and allow for uncertainty when practicing their occupation. I've seen you post this rant (or versions of it) repeatedly over the years. Of course I get it and wouldn't want to discourage you from forwarding your core 'belief.' That being said, what does it have to do with the post you are responding to? >>>The Republican Party doesn't even believe in evolution! Evolution is taught as fact in every major university in the world and is reproduced many times a day in the lab. There is not a bit of theory in it, it is absolute hard-core 100% percent fact.<<< You've forwarded the claim, now it is on you to provide a source representing the Republican Party's belief to support your claim. Some whacko carry a picket doesn't qualify, your source has to be accepted by the Vast Republican Party as a spokes person for their beliefs. If you can't find such a source you must acknowledge that it is merely your conjecture, one that most republicans reject. >>>There is not a bit of theory in it, it is absolute hard-core 100% percent fact.<<< It is actually the theory that most of the observations on adaptation are based. This does not make the findings any less factual. It does not account for origins except in theory and there is quite a bit of theory about things not yet accounted for.

To: koan who wrote (982008)	11/15/2016 7:31:55 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	1 Recommendation Recommended By POKERSAM Respond to of 1570744

only a really stupid sociologist would take an analysis of who supports what from huffingtonpost.com As an applied scientist of invisible fields and forces I have the education and experience to evaluate science. I can find the foundation information and evaluate it. The basic science that are the foundation of conjectured theories and how to look at real world data to evaluate the conjecture. The conjecture of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming driven by CO2 has been falsified over and over. The CO2 conjecture was modeled. Models are the best guess of those who believe the conjecture at showing how the CO2 will do it. The Models have failed totally. Thus the conjecture of how the physics of CO2 would create catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is falsified. Your post only shows that 100% of those associated with the huffingtonpost are science idiots. now agwn.homeip.net is an open directory on my personal web server. there are file there of years of info I have downloaded and looked at. Also I keep my insult leftyloons images there. you have zero science and tech background. your self image will never allow you to see how your positions on this topic reveal you are in the arena of science and technology dumber than a bag of hammer. Or in spite of all your assertions you are just one more leftyloon troll. have a nice day...

To: koan who wrote (982008)	11/15/2016 7:32:06 PM
From: POKERSAM	1 Recommendation Recommended By majaman1978 Respond to of 1570744

That is all bull kaka. All of the great scientist at one time thought the Earth was flat. They all went to the same schools and followed the same BS line they were taught. You and your son-in-law are idiots. Funny ones though. lol Nothing funnier than a man educated far beyond his intelligence becoming a self proclaimed intellectual and constantly pointing to his education for validation. All one has to do to get PhD is stay in school long enough.