Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (982500)	11/18/2016 12:07:08 AM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575421

"Laissez Faire Capitalism" is actually redundant, due to the nature of Capitalism. Therefore, simply "Capitalism" is sufficient to get the point across although historically it has been misrepresented as compatible with government economic interference.

To: Sdgla who wrote (982500)

11/18/2016 12:26:56 AM

From: THE WATSONYOUTH

1 Recommendation

Recommended By
locogringo

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575421

I did my part.

House Republicans put the brakes on earmarks ... for now.

Can't read this? Click here.

GRASSROOTS ACTION TEAM

Thanks to the thousands of calls made and emails sent by our Grassroots Action Team this week, House Republicans stopped the effort to bring back earmarks and pork-barrel spending.

It's a major victory for liberty that was won by freedom-loving Americans who took action and made their voices heard.

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) stopped the rules change because of how bad it would look for Republicans to embrace earmarks after Americans voted to "drain the swamp."

It was a smart move, but he left the door open to bringing earmarks back later next year. Ryan said he would create a task force to report back with recommendations that could reopen the earmark favor factory.

So we won this initial battle, but the earmark war is not over.

We will keep you updated as earmarks raise their ugly head in the coming months. Together, we will hold the new Republican Congress accountable and make the 2016 elections matter.

MERIT VS POLITICS

Taxpayer funding should be allocated using a competitive, transparent, and merit-based process, not by a handful of powerful politicians trying to score points with key donors and special interests. And funding decisions should not be made during secret negotiations in the appropriations committees or in secret deals made with agency officials.

Earmarks not only lead to bad spending decisions, but they are also used to buy votes for budget-busting bills. Just look at Obamacare, which was passed with the Cornhusker Kickback.

If Congress disagrees with how funds are allocated by the Executive Branch, it should provide oversight to hold the agencies accountable and change the authorizing law if necessary to better serve national interests.

But in most cases, the funding in question is not part of a true federal responsibility and should be eliminated – something that will never happen if politicians have the power to earmark the funds to their cronies.

Thank you for responding to our action alert this week and for making your voice heard. If you had not made so much noise, House Republicans would have snuck this through behind closed doors.