SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canada - Friend or Foe -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Seagrove who wrote (85)11/21/2016 12:44:39 PM
From: philv1 Recommendation

Recommended By
James Seagrove

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 202
 
I have been impressed with Premier Wall's common sense approach to things. Those in favour of shutting down these plants better not complain about the rising cost of living. Phasing out coal will increase electricity costs for consumers, as coal is the cheapest form of energy. Same kind of b.s. is going on south of the border.

Maybe they can ship the coal fired boilers to China, who needs them, and are building many many more? China would be happy to take them off our hands.

China keeps building coal plants despite new overcapacity policy ...

Jul 13, 2016 - Chinese energy companies have been starting two coal power projects a week despite a recent government policy designed to tackle the country's overcapacity crisis, according to a new Greenpeace analysis. China currently has over 900,000MW of coal-fired capacity, the equivalent of about 1,300 large coal-fired units.



To: James Seagrove who wrote (85)11/21/2016 12:54:20 PM
From: toccodolce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 202
 
What Canada does regarding in the arena of climate change is irrelevant and useless. Canada is but a speck in the grand scheme of things compared to the U.S., India and China in terms of pollution. China and India will open 3000 new coal mines within the same time.

Odumbo's climate legacy has migrated to Canada.

Tocco