Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (983614)	11/23/2016 4:52:43 PM
From: POKERSAM	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578253

Don't you have an answer to the rest of the material I sent to you. I assume you did not read all of it. Confirmation bias makes fools of those who practice it. Science is not on your side. The religion of MMGW is all you have. I realize it is beyond the capability of any to convince you of the truth in a forum such as this. You, like the rest of the idiots here, need full deprogramming.

To: combjelly who wrote (983614)	11/23/2016 5:20:37 PM
From: Taro	2 Recommendations Recommended By Investor Clouseau locogringo Respond to of 1578253

Was introduced to in when I got my BS in Marine Science. Is that all you have? I thought your academic credentials would be more impressive than that. This based on your pounding the gorilla breast that hard on our board! /Taro

To: combjelly who wrote (983614)	11/23/2016 5:58:20 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578253

strained jam, what fake news story is the basis of your conclusion that Freeman Dyson's opinions on AGW are based on only climate models of the 1980s. Now the climate models of the years 2000+ predicted this warm spot. And it never was or is now. OK this from the fake science of the IPCC, but that is your gospel after all. I have no idea what someone learns getting a degree in Marine Science. But if this figure below does not make it obvious to you the current models are simply bovine excrement makers with faster speeds then I suggest you sue your alma mater for a refund. In science methods you learned squat.

To: combjelly who wrote (983614)	11/24/2016 2:03:59 PM
From: PKRBKR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578253

Navier-Stokes What does this have to do with AGW? The only reason to add this into any AGW model is obfuscation.