Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (983696)	11/24/2016 12:19:58 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583405

If you look at the quanity of H20 vs CO2 and consider H2O is 100 times the green house gas as CO2 per molicule, the green gas effect is itty bitty. Now if one looks at the emission characteristics of aerosols vs any green house gas, it the ratio 1000 or 1 million to one. If CO2 is being shown to increase the greening of Earth by million and million of acre and all that greening releases tons and megatons more pollen does that suggest slower cooling. But models use a conjecture of how some equation conjecture of the radiation properties of gases work and this is how it works out vs reality. The conjecture of AGW as proffered by the IPCC is bullshit. The greening of millions of acres is a mega benefit to mankind. QED