Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (984228)	11/27/2016 6:17:42 PM
From: FJB	2 Recommendations Recommended By gronieel2 Mick Mørmøny Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577883

GROTESQUE MONSTER *SHE'S BACK!!*

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (984228)	11/27/2016 6:41:03 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577883

Recounts are okay with me, I don't think for a minute this election would be changed by any recount. But heck, they can recount every election every election year as far as I'm concerned.

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (984228)	11/27/2016 8:06:34 PM
From: Bonefish	3 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo Thomas A Watson TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577883

Dems nearly always gain in recounts. That said, Michigan is about the only state close enough to warrant a recount. Trouble is, try as they did they couldn't find enough votes in Detroit to make up the difference. So I think they finally certified it. Seems all this hoopla is nothing more than a fundraiser.