To: Ken W who wrote (516 ) 1/4/1998 5:35:00 PM From: D LEE Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 876
Ken W. - I think it Still deserves monitoring for the education Zeev's words assure me there will be no knife catching here unless something truly unusual rears its head, and most likely, ugly as sin (price-wise) to those here now. In reality I expect any releases will be designed to encourage people to react and then wish they hadn't. Ken W, your post script : "This the next to last under 1 stock I own... no more... moving to the above 5 range... I'm tired of reverse splits and CEO BS." is the attitude they're trying to encourage us to take towards smaller stocks in general, by necessity. they're trying to preserve the integrity of the market and know that one way to reduce the pool of stock an investor can/wants to be interested in is by making an example, shaking several of them off the market, in NASDAQU'S case. They even concocted a world level effort to tromp our interest in gold, in an urgent way, immediately, during the market tremor in October. That was to avoid a goldrush and funnel the scared money into bonds from where I sit here in the U.S.. Now they can pretend it's healthy for the mining companies while they slap Band-Aids on various banking systems. Their intentions are good but when/if they loose control the results will be more violent. So I'm trying to figure out the real purpose of news more or less from the sidelines of things. All thread members: Above is the first time I ever leaned on Zeev for info. It was on behalf of, or for, the benefit of this thread. The type of news he had to bring is what I consider to be the important type and the most truthful. For about 20 months now, I have been aware of Zeev's presence on a few threads. I don't think I have ever owned stock in any company Zeev has, but I feel any one who takes notice of his meandering here on SI may develop improvements in deciding where to put the money, and how much. Dave