To: Frankly Speaking who wrote (8067 ) 11/29/2016 4:49:35 PM From: marcos Respond to of 8273 tk.v - still don't have many here, except in daughter's college acct, got her better part of a position months ago, .20 even ... in others, had fingers crossed for sub-20s, even mid-.teens ... but then Zn started getting boisterous, we'll see to what extent that counters the force of tax-loss dumping svb.to - any adds here will be smallish because i sold so little months ago ... probably will raise allocation of it this year though, got it on short list definitely ... did add bits .15 or thereabouts on the way down, since then been so out of touch i missed it printing .12 the first day, got a few just above that after ... needs both metals, that's the thing with Sierra Mojada, they don't both need to be absolutely rocking, but one can't be in a coma and expect shareprice performance ... pulling together however, when the time comes, hoo-hah that's rocket stock [again] Not fair how you're trying to scoop svb for the contest, ahem -g- ... had the very same thought as LC on seeing that ... that rule in contests, that each ticker can be held by only one participant, is very restrictive and does not in any way reflect real trading ... it just makes it less work for the person keeping track, which is important ... some techie could set up a programme for contests that would, say, let each entrant hold up to three picks at any given time, and trade them ... using real-time quotes, and deducting appropriate commission for each trade as well ... say, everybody gets ten grand at the start, and up to a dozen trades, with all accounting automatic, using some broker's real-time quotes ... it would be good advertising for that house, if they did it right Was reading some pieces on Europe earlier ... imho to get a grip on that situation, you really need to understand the treaty of Westphalia - youtube.com