Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (985544)	12/3/2016 10:44:34 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Recommended By Stock Puppy Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571068

>>>There you go challenging again. Not a good idea to challenge him. Better to try and understand him. <<< Of course I did, its what I do. I understand the application of the Uncertainty Principle with regards to quantum physics. Heisenberg referred to a specific thing existing in a point in time, not why it was in the state it was at that point in time and why states change (from nothing to something and on and on...evolution). You applied the Uncertainty Principle to the "why" question. The popular idea of the uncertainty principle often gets mis-applied in this manner and is unchallenged. That application is flawed as I demonstrated. The question now becomes, did you not understand the logic of my challenge? Do you disagree with it, how so?