Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (985610)

12/4/2016 1:38:04 PM

From: koan

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580439

That post makes no sense.

It is not me rating him. You're right, I am not qualified to rate him. Just as I'm not qualified to challenge Richard Lindzen on climate. But I know I am not qualified. Some here don't seem to know that they are unqualified to rate many top scientists. But 97% of the top climate scientists in the world are and they think he is a fraud.

It is the world scientific community that has rated Heisenbderg. He is considered Albert Einstein's equal. His Heisenberg uncertainty Principle has stood amazing scrutiny and found correct.

If you want to orient yourself to reality, you have to come to terms with the fact that only 6% are Republicans and 80% lean Democratic.

You might want to try and be honest about that statistic.

<<


None of us on SI are qualified academically to challenge anything he said If nobody is qualified to academically challenge him they are even less qualified to rate him as highly as do you.