SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (462)1/4/1998 6:21:00 AM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4711
 
Sorry to throw a monkey-wrench in it, chaps, but the primary reason any &#145effs&#146, or an extra &#145the&#146 would be missed is the fact the these examples are &#145all-caps&#146.

During the last 400 years&#151since Gutenburg, at least&#151the publishing industry has been studying legibility and refining their craft. They've discovered that when people read, they tend to &#145gather clumps&#146 of three or four words. Shape recognition of the words plays a large part in one's ability to read&#151not just character shape of the letters, but the actual word shape as well.

All-caps text becomes a morass of multiple rectangles to the eye. The words in mixed-cap text have actual shape. Try these same examples in mixed-cap and you'll notice that the survey participants suddenly get a lot smarter, i.e. find all of the &#145effs’they tend to stick out.

-MrB



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (462)1/4/1998 12:34:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Respond to of 4711
 
I find that when I proof read my own writing I am much more adept at finding what I would consider mistakes then when reading the prose of others.

I'm the opposite. Since I know what I meant to say, I assume that's what I did say, and so often don't catch errors. Until, of course, the thing is actually published: then one's eye is immediately drawn to every stupid typo.