SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Richard Ney and the Wall Street Gang -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ccryder who wrote (88)1/5/1998 2:47:00 AM
From: BenYeung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 492
 
Have you noticed the action of the Dow in the last month? IBD has an article on it, saying that the TWO rallies had little volume and the TWO big decline had above average volume.

Using Ney's Theory, specialists are selling short to insiders during the rallies and use the declines to accumlated/cover shorts. I believe this cycle will continue, but likely to bring the Dow up to a new high a one point (but not necessarily sustain at that high) before February.

Heavy volume on the upside is indeed dangerous. Looking back in July/August, remember the 10-12 day heavy volume rally interrupted after MSFT announced great earnings. They called it profit taking and sell on MSFT excuse. Then airlines and some NASDAQ (semis) continued to advance, then the semis ended up getting hammered the most after the Oct mini-crash. Airlines are still going strong, but I am not a momentum chaser and I think they are dangerous to be in right now.

Remember I mentioned AT&T's advance a few weeks ago, using new CEO (by the way, M. Armstrong spoke at my graduation when he was still heading Hughes) and restructuring and improvement as excuses. Now, it retreated as "telecommunication deregulation" matters scared "investors."

I tended to explain market actions using Ney, but I still pick and analyse stocks using W. ONeil, W. Buffett and P. Lynch. Ney is not a good stock picker, in my opinion. His portfolio matched S&P, but does not outperform it. But hey, he's pretty right on market direction, right?