To: TideGlider who wrote (986114 ) 12/7/2016 1:36:39 PM From: koan Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577186 What lie? How many studies do I need to quote you? Who is more believable than the academies of science from 80 countries for Christs sake? I can quote you people and studies all day long if you need. You probably don't believe in evolution either, or that cigarettes cause cancer. Why do you want to appear dumb? Because that is what people will think of you for challenging such obvious evidence.skepticalscience.com Consensus on Consensus - Cook et al. (2016)Authors of seven climate consensus studies — including Naomi Oreskes , Peter Doran , William Anderegg , Bart Verheggen , Ed Maibach , J. Stuart Carlton , and John Cook — co-authored a paper that should settle the expert climate consensus question once and for all. The two key conclusions from the paper are: 1) Depending on exactly how you measure the expert consensus, it’s somewhere between 90% and 100% that agree humans are responsible for climate change , with most of our studies finding 97% consensus among publishing climate scientists. 2) The greater the climate expertise among those surveyed, the higher the consensus on human-caused global warming. Expert consensus results on the question of human-caused global warming among the previous studies published by the co-authors of Cook et al. (2016) . Illustration: John Cook. Available on the SkS Graphics page That humans are causing global warming is the position of the Academies of Science from 80 countries plus many scientific organizations that study climate science. More specifically, around 95% of active climate researchers actively publishing climate papers endorse the consensus position. <<Piss poor response. You need to stop quoting that old worn out lie!