Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Paracelsian Inc (PRLN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Judy Muldawer who wrote (3432)	1/4/1998 1:46:00 PM
From: paul goldstein	Respond to of 4342

JUDY, just think about a few issues.. with out any emotion as if done unemotionally, a person would not own prln, or consider buying it.. with that said..i continue <grin> stock should have gone to zero or maybe , out of business. but, it held out , for now at least. so, who was buying in december as tax loss and others sold? well, it interested me, so i decided, with only my logic, not for others, that you or me could have sold out in dec and offset against gains.. but, i decided, when the dust settles, stock will hit bottom and i decided it would be in last few weeks of december. now, i consider a move to fifty cents an opportunity for me to sell the shares bought in december..while maintianing what i have as a position.at much higher prices.. could even sell at fifty cents some more expensive prln and average out some shares at even. now this works for me, not for others.. i am just bottom fishing not saying i see anything just looking at a stock i just like even though the stock price killed all of us.. so my reasoning is, january will be kind to all stocks that were killed last year.. not sure what they call buying the low priced ones..but sometimes it works, other times it does not. so i plan to post on prln if, said if, it moves up in price. if it does not, so be it.. but, i got a feeling, just personal, it may have sen its darkest days or nights.. JUST REMEMBER, AS I CAN'T KEEP REPEATING TI, I ONLY STATE WHAT I DO, NOT WHAT OTHERS DO, OR SHOULD DO, OR EVEN TO INFLUENCE OTHERS. JUST POSTING AS I SEE IT..AS RELAXATION OR TO BE SOCIABLE.

To: Judy Muldawer who wrote (3432)	1/7/1998 10:06:00 PM
From: Hank	Respond to of 4342

Judy, The only value PRLN now has is that of a NASD shell. Believe me, it has been looked over by those that are interested in such things. The fact that it hasn't even garnished a takeover bid based on this possibility isn't exactly encouraging. I would say the "bottom" here is "0". Hank

To: Judy Muldawer who wrote (3432)	1/11/1998 10:04:00 PM
From: Elllk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4342

Judy I also still have my shares and warrants but I'm not sure it is anything to write home about or to SI about nor do I think it justifies Paul's exuberant shift to the upper-case. In retrospect the whole PRLN story may be another minor moment in the history of snake oil or Kickapoo Indian Medicine. We may have been conned by both Keith and John. As I have posted in the past, my main hope is that at least Keith, who continues to be the major shareholder as far as I know, has some pride and will not turn out to be one of the anorexec, anemic, uni-bomber con artists who can only carry out a con in one direction. If Keith doesn't have something up his sleeve to also make a ton of money on the upside, where will he rate? So far even the Kilmer's made a lot more money on Swamproot, nevermind Victor Lustig who sold the Eiffel as scrap metal, not once but twice. Yup, for better or worse, I've got my money on Keith. Larry