Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Trader X who wrote (1881)	1/4/1998 11:24:00 AM
From: tech	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3391

Mr. Hansens views countered one by one. 1. >> Bollinger bands are useless at predicting a bottom or reversal of trend. << I did not use the bollinger bands for my analysis, I just posted what they were at. 2. >> As for major shareholders not letting the stock drop below $4... that's also nonsense. Insiders are the major shareholders and they have to register intent to buy with the SEC first. We would see that coming ahead of time. << Wrong again. Anyone who has more than 5% of stock in a company is considered to be a major shareholder. These shareholders have an inherent interest to see the stock on NASDAQ. As well as the MM's who trade the stock. 3. >> Also, the $4 price bottom for a NASD listing is moot, since SCGI is still has an NASD stock trading investigation open--unresolved--that will prevent them from getting a listing anyway. Result: $4 floor is not a factor. << EXCUSE ME!!!! "STILL HAS A NASD STOCK TRADING INVESTIGATION " You have now, as angel has several times, posted FALSE and MISLEADING information on this thread. Since you have previously seen the information regarding the NASD ROUTINE REVIEW (that was done over a year ago), you know that there is no "INVESTIGATION". Since you were made aware of this, your intentions here are clearly shown. Furthermore, who has told you that ConSyGen can not get a NASDAQ listing based on this review that happened over a year ago ? If you have talked with anyone at NASDAQ, please post their contact information on this thread. If you fail to do so, it is clear that you have not talked with anyone at NASDAQ and you are purposely, intentionally, and knowingly, posting false and misleading information about a publicly traded company. The word " investigation" has not been used in any SEC filing or in any information notice either from NASD, ConSyGen, or the SEC.

To: Trader X who wrote (1881)	1/4/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: tech	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3391

Now you are posting false information about me. >> And my point of posting here the past two weeks has been that tech is no fool. Therefore he must be a hired gun. The smoke is all around us. << If you believe that someone has hired me, then feel free to prove it. YOU HAVE FAILED TO DO SO I have stated, one more than one occasion, that I am an investor who owns shares in this company and have a right to post my opinions. If you claim that I am a hired gun, then you must provide evidence to support your claim. I have been a member of the SI long before CSGI was even a company. Kevin, don't try to mislead anyone. You haven't been here for that last 2 weeks to do anything but try to trash CSGI. You have no point but to feed your own misguided ego. As Mr. Vance pointed out, you take no positions and only talk big from the sidelines. Your posts here are only meant to trash ConSyGen, and continue this back and forth with me. However, you have realized that unlike others, I will throw all the mud you toss over here right back at you. You clearly have no understanding of the Year 2000 problem and you are only here to post whatever you can to attempt to trash this company. I not only like it, I WELCOME IT! Because when CSGI performs, as I expect it will, I can't wait to see how you are going to twist you way out of it.