Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (986251)	12/8/2016 11:21:44 AM
From: d[-_-]b	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB TideGlider Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570970

adapted to grow at a narrow range of CO2 and elevating the CO2 levels shows no improvement or inhibits growth. co2 enrichment in greenhouse growing has been used for decades and somewhere between 700-1000ppm is considered the optimal level. So assuming plants adapted to this via their long evolution and the fact the planet is running a co2 deficit based on historical averages more co2 will be a net positive for life on earth. That said it does not work for every crop - suspect this article like most AGW fake science was cherry picking - besides no one grows wheat in a greenhouse, it's not economical - but then what do libtards know about economics either.