Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mohan Marette who wrote (12663)	1/4/1998 1:24:00 PM
From: Kenneth R Miller	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Hi Mohan, It's a bit funny that since using ZACKS service I've been traking AT&T and all during the time that T was 34 it was rated a 5 by zacks and then when it got to 55 It was rated a 1.. That is telling you to not buy at 34, but instead buy at 55... I always thought it was better to buy low and sell high. <ggg> Also I bought a lot of CPQ at 77 when it was a "Strong buy" and ended up with lots of CPQ chasing it down to 52.. I don't think I played that too smart either. I think Jorge has a better strategy... It seems to me that Zacks is usually outdated and not up to date as well as DLJ having CPQ on its recommended list while it was 77 and then dropping it from the list when it was in a downtrend. I'm probably not the only one that ended up owning CPQ at such a high average price... judging from the other posts on this thread... I guess in 5 years it wouldn't make any difference, but who wants their money to be dead money?