SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jon Koplik who wrote (18500)12/12/2016 2:36:31 AM
From: John Pitera1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Ron

  Respond to of 33421
 
Here is the US yield curve broken down in it's components and not shown on a single curve.

yes the 2 year note is on the bottom of the top chart it's that little Green line whose movements since they are on an absolute and not relative % basis .. the 2 year note yield moves most sublimely.

a 3 year time horizon.



---------------------

a 10 year time horizon



---------------------

40 years of the US components of the yield curve.



--------------------

and 50 years of the component parts of the treasury yield curve.( 2 year note yields above 16% on 2 year notes maturity at 100 in 24 months.



JP



To: Jon Koplik who wrote (18500)12/13/2016 2:31:31 AM
From: John Pitera1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Jon Koplik

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 33421
 
HI Jon, China has a number of fresh warning signs from issues of a crack down on speculation in sectors of the stock market... The Currency -- YUAN is depreciating as interest rates go up and concerns of Capital flight have given us fresh indications of this going on.... It may be partly driving up the price of Bit Coin recently

China1. Let’s begin with China, where the stock market stumbled again as the Chinese authorities continue their arbitrary acts of rulemaking. This time they hit the insurance industry, criticizing some of the larger firms for buying stocks.







China Vanke, a developer who was apparently being acquired last month, slumped another 6% as a result of the officials’ criticizing leveraged buyouts (ending the acquisition).




2. The nation’s government bond yields rose further, with corporate yields following. The selloff in the corporate sector has been especially acute at the short-end of the curve. Are we seeing some redemptions from wealth management products (WMPs) who tend to hold a great deal of corporate debt?







3. The renminbi is expensive to borrow in Hong Kong again. Rates have been rising quickly for term loans (as opposed to overnight). Here is the 3-month yuan HIBOR rate.




Part of the reason for the tighter offshore yuan market is Hong Kong’s decline in yuan time deposits. Hong Kong residents used to open renminbi accounts to get a much higher rate relative to the Hong Kong dollar. But after the August 2015 devaluation, deposit volumes have been declining. Beijing’s tightening of capital controls is also reducing the yuan availability in Hong Kong.




4. The renminbi implied volatility jumped in recent days as investors brace for more currency declines.




5. Bitcoin hit a multiyear high as market participants continue to point fingers at China’s residents.




6. Many ask where the rest of Asia will stand in a US-China trade dispute. Here are the China- vs. US-bound exports from the largest Asian economies (ex-Japan).


Source: Barclays, @NickatFP, @joshdigga

7. China’s latest batch of economic releases looks quite stable. In fact, some argue that these figures are too stable to be real (with only minimal fluctuations on a year-over-year basis).

• Industrial Production:




• Retail Sales:




• Fixed Asset Investment:




8. China’s Western acquisitions spiked in 2016. With Bejing concerned about capital outflows, will all this shopping spree slow down next year?


Source: @Bfly, @business, @Tmp_Research; Read full article

Back to Index



AsiaThis chart shows the dramatic decline in South Korea’s Park Geun-hye approval ratings – ultimately leading to her impeachment.


Source: @WSJGraphics, @Tmp_Research; Read full article



To: Jon Koplik who wrote (18500)12/16/2016 12:58:02 AM
From: John Pitera2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Hawkmoon
sixty2nds

  Respond to of 33421
 
China Halts Trading in Key Bond Futures as Panicky Investors Sell Securities
Slowing growth, capital outflows fuel concerns that bull market is coming to an end



Trading in bond futures resumed after the government injected funds into the short-term money market. PHOTO: WU HONG/EUROPEAN PRESSPHOTO AGENCY

Updated Dec. 15, 2016 7:05 p.m. ET

SHANGHAI—Chinese bond yields soared and authorities halted trading in some futures contracts for the first time on Thursday, as a global bond-market selloff worsened a day after the Federal Reserve signaled a quicker pace of interest-rate increases next year.

The Chinese 10-year government bond yield, which rises when prices fall, hit a 16-month high of 3.4%, extending selling that began in late November and accelerated this week amid slowing growth, outflows of capital and concerns over asset bubbles.

In early trading, the 10-year and five-year government-bond futures recorded their biggest ever drops in price, falling by 2% and 1.2%, respectively, leading exchange authorities to suspend the securities.

Trading resumed only after China’s central bank injected about $22 billion into the short-term money market.

Later in the global day, the selling sent the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note to 2.639%, before settling at 2.580%, compared with 2.523% the day before. It marks the yield’s highest close since September 2014.



ENLARGE


The Fed raised its benchmark policy rate by a quarter of a percentage point on Wednesday, as investors had expected. But the central bank also forecast three more rate increases in 2017, a surprise for investors.

“The market was not expecting a change,” said Mike Amey, a portfolio manager at Pacific Investment Management Co. “You can see that in the reaction in the market.”

Prices of short-dated bonds, which are particularly sensitive to changes in monetary policy, also weakened. The yield on the two-year Treasury note rose 0.023 percentage point to 1.261%.

In Europe, the yield on 10-year German government bonds rose 0.062 percentage point, to 0.363%, while the yield on equivalent Australian debt jumped almost 0.2 percentage point, to 2.903%.

U.K. government bonds were among the hardest hit. The yield on the 10-year note declined slightly after the Bank of England said it would keep interest rates and its bond-buying program steady Thursday, but remained up 0.1 percentage point, at 1.352%.



ENLARGE
Trading in key bond futures resumed Thursday only after China’s central bank injected around $22 billion into the short-term money market.PHOTO: REUTERS


During the summer, bond prices rallied, sending yields to record lows following the U.K.’s vote to leave the European Union. Investors piled into government bonds, especially long-term debt, as they expected a prolonged period of soft global growth, low inflation and ultraloose monetary stimulus from major central banks in Japan and Europe.

But global data over the past few months have shown an improved economic outlook and a slight rise in inflation pressure, causing investors to lighten up on bonds. That narrative has been gaining traction since the U.S. election on Nov. 8, as expectations have been increasing that expansive fiscal policy, lower taxes and lighter regulation proposed by U.S. President-elect Donald Trump would lead to stronger growth and higher inflation.

Between Election Day and this past Wednesday, the global bond selloff has wiped out $1.45 trillion in market value from the Bloomberg Barclays Global Treasury index, which tracks government bonds in both developed and developing countries.

Chinese investors appear to think the Fed’s move increases the chance China will guide its own rates higher to stem the yuan’s recent decline against the dollar and heavy capital outflows from the country.

But the bond-market slump also exacerbates the policy dilemma facing China’s central bank. The People’s Bank of China has tightened short-term lending in recent weeks in an effort to make it harder for speculative investors to borrow money. The problem is that such tightening moves—along with any future rate increases—could provoke market plunges and panics as liquidity dries up.

“The Chinese bond bull market is over, as we have seen a turning point in money-market rates this year,” said Yang Delong, chief economist at Shenzhen-based First Seafront Fund Management Co., which has $6 billion under management, referring to a tightening of liquidity in China that began this autumn and has recently gathered pace.

China has unleashed a wave of easy credit and fiscal stimulus in recent years to keep its slowing economy afloat. Chinese investors were able to benefit by borrowing cheap money and pouring it into assets from bonds to housing to commodities, producing what some economists have described as a series of unsustainable bubbles.

Some of these bubbles have burst over the past 18 months, with the crash in China’s stock market in the summer of 2015 the most notable example.t, Now the pain has spread to the $9 trillion bond market which remains overwhelmingly driven by domestic investors, despite some opening up to foreigners this year. The yield on 10-year government bonds had dropped as low as 2.6% in August.

“People woke up to the fact that the bond bubble is too large,” said Hao Hong, co-head of research at BoCom International, which is owned by Hong Kong’s Bank of Communications. “The bond market in China is under severe pressure, across the board.”

Underscoring the skittish feeling among investors, Thursday’s selling pressure was also driven by rumors spreading through the markets. A midsize Chinese brokerage denied a report in a major Chinese newspaper that it had defaulted on a large bond payment. One of the country’s biggest fund managers, meanwhile, denied a rumor circulating on cellphone chat groups that it was facing large redemptions.

Analysts said such rumors carried weight because many fund managers are heavily in debt, making them vulnerable to declining bond prices.

“The market is very sensitive to rumors now,” said Ke Congwei, a fixed-income analyst at Guosen Securities, based in Shenzhen.

The bond selloff adds to broader concerns about the Chinese economy, which likely expanded at its slowest pace in more than 25 years in 2016, weighed down by an increasing debt load and money-losing state-owned industries.

China is also grappling with large-scale capital outflows. The country has lost about $1.2 trillion of its foreign reserves, or around a quarter of its total, in the past two years as billionaires and average citizens transfer savings to the safety of overseas markets.




To stem the outflows, authorities are using measures such as restricting overseas company acquisitions, transactions that could be fronts for spiriting money out of the country.

—Yifan Xie, John Lyons and Min Zeng

http://www.wsj.com/articles/china-halts-trading-in-key-bond-as-panicky-investors-sell-securities-1481803121








To: Jon Koplik who wrote (18500)1/27/2017 1:35:51 AM
From: Jon Koplik4 Recommendations

Recommended By
3bar
Hawkmoon
John Pitera
mary-ally-smith

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
Bloomberg -- world’s most populous country is turning gray at an accelerating pace .................

January 26 , 2017

The World's Most Populous Country Is Turning Gray

Bloomberg News

Shrinking labor force would create a drag on consumption
Lopsided population balance puts strain on economic growth

The world’s most populous country is turning gray at an accelerating pace.

That aging has big implications for China’s economic growth, which could be undermined as the labor force declines sharply from 2021 to 2030. It also strains the nation’s expenditures for public services, insurance, and health care, and puts a dent in domestic consumption.

China’s latest population development plan, released by the State Council late Wednesday, projects that about a quarter of China’s population will be 60 or older by 2030. That’s up from 13.3 percent of the population in the country’s latest census in 2010.

The number of children 14 or younger will decline to 17 percent over the same period, the plan estimated, without saying what base it used for comparison. About 36 percent of the population in 2030 will be 45 to 59, it said. The 2010 census showed that age group accounted for about 20 percent of the total population. shrinking labor force would further erode China’s competitive edge in manufacturing but would also be a drag on consumption, now a major pillar of the economy as it transitions away from old smokestack drivers of growth.

A year ago, authorities took a big step to try to add to the country’s population pipeline by scrapping the more than three-decade-old one-child policy. That didn’t result in the initial boost that demographers had projected.

Births in 2016 reached 17.86 million, the most since 2000, rising by 1.91 million from 2015, the National Health and Family Planning Commission said this month. That still falls short of the official projection. Last June, the ministry estimated there would be an increase of 4 million new births every year until 2020. China will continue to implement the two-child policy to promote a balanced population, the plan said.

Even so, the latest plan said birth rates could remain low. The total population is now expected to peak around 2030 and begin to decline after that. The plan set a population target of 1.42 billion by 2020, and 1.45 billion by 2030. It also supported more urbanization, with more than 13 million people projected to move to cities from rural areas every year between 2016 and 2020.

­ With assistance by Miao Han

Copyright © 2017 BLOOMBERG L.P.

.



To: Jon Koplik who wrote (18500)2/9/2017 1:38:08 AM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
China's Currency Policy Approaches Breaking Point
FEB 7, 2017 8:00 PM EST
By Junheng Li

In his first few weeks in office, President Donald Trump has ordered the U.S. to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership and confirmed his intention to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement. The consensus is that it won’t be long before he turns his focus to China, which he calls a currency manipulator.

China can weather such criticism, for now. But if Trump’s threats of trade sanctions and 45 percent tariffs become real, the economic impact for the world's second-biggest economy would be meaningful and could upend financial markets, potentially leading to a global recession. With economic growth already slowing and capital fleeing the nation, China's $11 trillion economy is operating from a position of weakness.



Here’s how it plays out: As the world’s dominant reserve currency, the dollar has no peer. International Monetary Fund data show that the greenback accounts for 63.3 percent of global foreign-exchange reserves, with the euro next at 20.3 percent, followed by the British pound and Japanese yen, both at 4.5 percent. That means that in times of crisis, the dollar benefits from global investors seeking a haven, even if the strife and the the uncertainty emanates from the U.S.

It’s possible that a trade war would drive flows into the dollar, putting upward pressure on the currency at the expense of other exchange rates. That would be on top of the natural demand for the greenback created by the anticipation of significant fiscal stimulus floated by the Trump administration and a faster pace of interest-rate increases by the Federal Reserve.



In terms of China, it’s important to remember that the yuan’s external value is managed by authorities in a way that isn’t compatible with a sharp appreciation pressure of the dollar vis-à-vis all other currencies. The currency is managed to achieve a stable, effective, trade-weighted exchange rate and to foster a gently crawling peg relative to the dollar. That peg would be threatened if a trade war weakened China’s economy at a faster rate than forecast. What was presented as a gradual depreciation of the yuan last year was in reality a significant 6 percent weakening of the currency versus the dollar as China’s domestic woes mounted. A collapse of the crawling peg could lead to yuan depreciation that is three times as large.



Although the pace of depletion of China’s foreign-exchange reserves has eased from $100 billion per month in late 2015, the leakage shows no signs of abating. The $3 trillion official figure for China’s reserves probably overstates the amount of dollars actually available for intervention to support the yuan by at least $1 trillion, possibly more. At least $500 billion of reserves are “encumbered” by forward sales of dollars by the Chinese authorities, which they will actually have to deliver in the future.

The IMF estimates that China needs at least $2.6 trillion of “working capital” to allow companies and the government to conduct import/export operations. The “working capital” is unlikely to be available to defend the yuan because that money has to be held “in reserve” as a fiscal backstop if systemically important Chinese firms with dollar exposure are threatened with insolvency.

Although China may be nearing the point where a significant devaluation of the currency would make sense, there are obvious reasons that the authorities would want to avoid a sharp weakening of the yuan anytime soon. First, the domestic political cost of a collapse of the currency in the year leading up to the 19th Party Congress would be significant. Second, a sharp bilateral weakening would provide the Trump administration with the ammunition to declare China to be a “currency manipulator” and impose trade or investment-related sanctions. The authorities will do everything they can to avoid a hard yuan landing before the party congress.

It’s clear that China’s current currency policy is unsustainable. It can, of course, last longer than anyone anticipates, and then abruptly end. That’s the likely fate awaiting the crawling peg.

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-02-08/china-s-currency-policy-approaches-breaking-point




-----------------------------------------




comments on article:

Dcoronata16 hours ago

disq.us
Okay, just a quick examination... China's GDP for 2015 in total Yuan was 68.9052T. When adjusted for inflation in fixed Yuan (2010) that was adjusted to 60.3212T ($9.3117T).
GDP for 2016 was 74.4127T Yuan, don't quite know what that is in 2010 Yuan but if they claim 6.8% that means inflation would be about 1.1%.
So adjusting for this we get Chinese GDP (2010 Yuan) of 64.223. Convert that to dollars (6.959 on 1/3/2017) and we come to the startling conclusion that relative to the US dollar, China's GDP fell by a small amount, 54 billion dollars to $9.2575.

US GDP (fixed 2009 dollars) went from $16.397T to $16.660T an increase of 263 billion, 2009 dollars.

1 Reply•Share ›

-


Stop Interveninga day ago

As usual...more fake news

1 Reply•Share ›

-


David Stop Intervening17 hours ago

Are you a pro-China whiner or a pro-Trump whiner?

4 Reply•Share ›

-


Dcoronata David17 hours ago

Does it make a difference?
Both seem to have the same at heart, even if they don't get Melindadsheehan Stop Intervening20 hours ago

Reply•Share ›

that.

3 Reply•Share ›

-




!mj225d:
??
??;?? http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash225DirectDirect\GetPay$97\Hour...

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????::::::!mj225d:....,.....


-


historyspeaks201612 hours ago

China is running with a full head of steam to make sure the AIIB takes as much business away from the IMF as possible in their region and around the world.

China's only worry is how many Europeans and Americans are working so that more people can afford to buy more junk/stuff from Chinese factories and keep their own people working.

Reply•Share ›

-


SailingNewYorkCity17 hours ago

If we're smart we can use this to our advantage. China knows their weaknesses, and we should threaten them with the loss of their most favored nation status unless they stop bullying their neighbors. We can also nationalize their treasuries as payment for enforcement of international law. Let's see if they change their tune then.

Reply•Share ›

-


Joseph Siewa day ago

Yawn.....

Reply•Share ›

-


Dcoronata Joseph Siew17 hours ago

This does make for interesting economic analysis. For example, the US GDP grew by more dollars in 2014 and 2015 than the Chinese GDP. I'll have to get the data for China when they release their final 2016 but it might be the case for 2016 as well.

1 Reply•Share ›

-


Joseph Siew Dcoronata16 hours ago

China 2014 $0.875T. 2015 $0.525T
USA 2014 $0.37T. 2015 $0.415T

But there's nothing proud about the figures. What's more important is whether China could contribute to the happiness of the world population. Currently, people from around the world, with the exception of China, Russia, the Philippines, etc., are unhappy with their governments. The western world decided they need extremists to lead them. I'm afraid with novices running the country, they would fall further behind and continue to blame the "enemies ", and eventually the hatred would become military conflicts.

Reply•Share ›

-


Dcoronata Joseph Siew16 hours ago

See analysis above- you aren't using exchange rates prevalent at the time.
In dollars comparing 1/2/2016 and 1/3/2017 rates, China's GDP actually fell.

Of course the Chinese people love their government- or else...

3 Reply•Share ›

-


Joseph Siew Dcoronata16 hours ago

The figures are all in USD....exchange rates prevalent at that time are taken into consideration.

Reply•Share ›

-


Dcoronata Joseph Siew16 hours ago

Again see my analysis above. Please note that a Yuan in 1/1/2014 compared to the US$ would be worth $0.8694 on 1/3/2017. That makes a huge difference.

3 Reply•Share ›

-


Joseph Siew Dcoronata5 hours ago

I respect that, but wouldn't it be more fruitful if you use PPP?

Reply•Share ›





To: Jon Koplik who wrote (18500)1/26/2019 11:40:38 PM
From: Jon Koplik5 Recommendations

Recommended By
DinoNavarre
elmatador
Ms. Baby Boomer
richardred
sixty2nds

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
Barrons -- China Demographics ! / China’s Slowdown Is Only Just Beginning ......................

Jan. 25, 2019

China’s Slowdown Is Only Just Beginning

By Matthew C. Klein

China’s long boom is over. Persistent weaknesses in productivity growth and a looming demographic catastrophe will hobble the country for decades to come.


Every society produces goods and services using workers, raw materials, and capital. Living standards rise as societies increase their use of these inputs -- putting more people to work, making them work longer hours, extracting and consuming more raw materials, and investing in more machines and technological research -- and get more efficient at transforming those inputs into things people actually want.

The Chinese economy has done an exemplary job of boosting its labor and capital inputs since Deng Xiaoping began the process of “reform and opening up” in 1978. It has done far less well at improving its use of those inputs. According to an estimate from Harry Xiaoying Wu of Japan’s Hitotsubashi University, China’s underlying efficiency has not improved at all since the mid-1980s. In fact, he estimates Chinese businesses are now 15% less productive than they were in 2007.

The problem is the government’s widespread and persistent interference in investment decisions -- ­a problem that has been getting worse. Since the end of 2012, the share of new credit extended to China’s state-owned enterprises has soared from about 50% to more than 80%. China’s vibrant pockets of private innovation have been squeezed for political reasons. While it is possible the political situation could change, and therefore lead to a renewed burst of productivity growth, as in 1978, that is not the likeliest outcome. Zero productivity growth, or even continued declines, are far more likely.

Reforms to the Chinese political system are at least theoretically possible. A radical improvement in China’s demographic outlook, however, is not. Until recently, China’s demographics provided a significant growth impulse to the Chinese economy. The number of Chinese aged 20-59 nearly doubled between 1978 and the peak in 2013, from 434 million to 855 million. Essentially all of the growth in the total number of Chinese during this period was caused by the booming number of people of prime working age.

Simply adding people to a society doesn’t make that society richer, although it can lead to higher production of goods and services to satisfy the needs of additional consumers. Adding workers, however, does lead to greater productive capacity. It is easier to raise material living standards for everyone when there are relatively fewer children and old people to support.

Even more important is adding workers in the right age range. Young people are inexperienced, while the elderly are less likely to generate new ideas or adapt to new technologies. Economists have repeatedly found that changes in the share of people in their 40s can meaningfully affect productivity growth. Patents, for example, are overwhelmingly filed by people in their 40s, while the best managers tend to be neither too young nor too old.

This theory neatly links the emergence and subsequent aging of the baby-boom generation to changes in U.S. productivity growth since the 1960s. Economists have found the general relationship between a society’s age structure and productivity holds elsewhere, including Europe and Japan. Here, too, China’s population structure was a tailwind for growth. The proportion of Chinese aged 40-49 doubled between 1978 and its peak in 2013. More than a third of the total growth in China’s population during its boom years came from the massive growth in the number of Chinese in their most-productive decade.

The positive growth impulse from demography has already begun to reverse, however. The number of Chinese aged 20-59 has already shrunk by about 0.5% since the peak in 2013, while the number of Chinese in their 40s has plunged by 10%.

Demographics are not destiny, but the baseline projections produced by the United Nations in its World Population Prospects imply things will only get worse. By 2049, the centenary of the founding of the People’s Republic and the target date set by the Communist Party for China to become a “modern socialist country that is prosperous,” the number of working-age Chinese will have shrunk by 25% from current levels, while the number of Chinese in their 40s will have dropped by another 30%.

China’s total population, however, is expected to remain relatively stable over this period. The rapid shrinkage of the working-age population is projected to be offset by the booming population of elderly Chinese as today’s workers age. The share of Chinese aged 70 and older is projected to rise from less than 7% today to 20% by 2049. That will place severe burdens on working-age Chinese, who will need to sacrifice their own consumption to support their elders.

The outlook for the second half of the century looks even grimmer. While population projections that far in advance can be prone to substantial errors, the baseline forecast is for the number of working-age Chinese to collapse by half over the next 80 years, even as the number of Chinese aged 70 or older nearly triples. No society has any experience with this kind of demographic transition, especially when starting from China’s low level of development.

It is difficult to imagine how China can become “prosperous” under these conditions, much less stay that way.

Write to Matthew C. Klein at matthew.klein@barrons.com

Copyright © 2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

.
.
.



To: Jon Koplik who wrote (18500)2/9/2019 11:28:57 AM
From: Jon Koplik4 Recommendations

Recommended By
DinoNavarre
elmatador
John Pitera
sixty2nds

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 33421
 
WSJ -- China’s Demographic Danger Grows as Births Fall Far Below Forecast .................................

Economy
The Outlook

Feb. 9, 2019

China’s Demographic Danger Grows as Births Fall Far Below Forecast

Number of newborns fell in 2018 and was well below expectations, despite lifting of one-child policy

The end of China’s draconian one-child policy has failed to bring an expected boom in births, adding yet another headwind to the country’s economy and compounding worries about its long-term growth potential.

Chinese leaders in 2016 scrapped the decades-old one-child policy after economists warned it was creating a demographic time bomb for China, contributing to a shrinking workforce and a rapidly aging population.

New data show the reversal isn’t having the anticipated impact. The number of newborns in China dropped to 15.23 million in 2018, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. That’s two million less than 2017 and 30% below the median official forecast of more than 21 million.

It was also the lowest level of births since 1961, when millions were struggling to survive during China’s Great Famine.

Newborns eventually become workers, making them essential to economic growth in the long run.

“The demographic outlook does appear to be deteriorating faster than officials had expected,” analysts at Capital Economics wrote in a recent research note.

That’s making it harder for officials to lower taxes much to stimulate growth, since doing so could make it tougher to shore up under-funded pension programs. It’s also making it harder to encourage consumers to boost spending, as more people worry over health and retirement costs.

The demographic outlook is fueling fears China could grow old before it gets rich, leaving it with too few workers to cover the cost of its aging population. That could stoke economic troubles that far outlast turbulence from trade battles this year.

China’s aging population and shrinking manpower pool “can only make for serious economic headwinds, presaging the end of China’s era of ‘heroic economic growth,’” the American Enterprise Institute’s Nicholas Eberstadt wrote in a report published in January.

China is graying earlier and faster than other countries. In 1970, China’s median age was nearly 10 years younger than that in the U.S. By 2015, it was older. By 2050, there will be 1.3 workers for each retiree, according to official estimates, compared with 2.8 now. U.S. government figures show about the same level in the U.S. now, and predict there will be 2.2 workers for every retiree in 2035.

Exacerbating the pressures, China has one of the world’s lowest average retirement ages -- 55 for most women, and 60 for men. Many people leave jobs while they’re still productive, with years of valuable experience, because they prefer to collect pensions and enjoy their older years while believing it is the government’s and society’s job to take care of them. That wastes human resources and creates even more retirees that must be supported by younger workers.

Some Chinese officials say the country’s two-child policy, which allows parents to have up to two children without penalty, is moving in the right direction. Ning Jizhe, head of the National Bureau of Statistics, noted in a recent press conference that China’s population kept growing last year and that the number of newborns was “still very substantial.”

China’s overall population is expected to start declining in 2030, after peaking at 1.44 billion, according to the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a government think tank.

President Xi Jinping recently cited rising pension and social-welfare costs as risks to China’s outlook. Many private economists say more aggressive measures -- including raising the retirement age -- are needed to prevent demographics from becoming a bigger drag.

Parents aren’t responding to looser family planning rules for many reasons, including higher costs for housing and education that have left people worried about caring for bigger families. Another reason is that most people of child-bearing age are single children, so a one-child family is the norm.

Li Anqi, a 31-year-old resident of Yancheng who runs a weight-loss business, said she has her hands full with one first-grader. “Who watches the baby if I have a second one?”

Ren Zeping, an economist at China Evergrande Group, published a report in January saying China should abandon all birth-control policies -- which include restrictions on having a third child -- because the population situation is “urgent.” He suggested officials provide subsidies to help families from pregnancy to education.

China’s pension system is supposed to cover more than 90% of the aging population. Each province or municipality runs its own pension pool, with funds coming through contributions from employers.

But many programs are under-funded and localities are struggling to pay retirees. By 2020, China’s pension shortfalls are expected to reach 1.1 trillion yuan, or about $163 billion, before rising to 3.8 trillion yuan in 2025, according to Hua Changchun, an economist at Guotai Junan Securities.

As a result, Beijing is trying to centralize the pension system while squeezing employers to make sure they pay into it. The crackdown may be exacerbating China’s economic slowdown, though.

Huang Weibin, the general manager of a property-management firm in Guangdong province, said higher pension costs mean his business will suffer a loss this year, likely forcing him to lay off some of his 80 employees.

“If the government doesn’t help us out with subsidies or tax breaks, we will go broke for sure,” he said.

His firm used to only hire young men and women no older than 30, he said. Now, most of them are in their 40s.

-- Liyan Qi and Fanfan Wang contributed to this article.

Copyright © 2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

.
.
.



To: Jon Koplik who wrote (18500)10/31/2019 2:43:58 PM
From: Jon Koplik2 Recommendations

Recommended By
DinoNavarre
sixty2nds

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
WSJ -- China ... Still Struggles With a Falling Birth Rate ...........................................

Oct. 31, 2019

China Left One-Child Policy Behind, but It Still Struggles With a Falling Birth Rate

Despite different methods of counting newborns, the numbers all point to a decline, threatening economic growth as the nation’s population ages

BEIJING -- China’s leaders were long anxious about a population ballooning too quickly. Now, they worry about the opposite: The country has one of the lowest fertility rates in the world, and recent data suggest its demographic bind is even more serious than thought.

The prospect of fewer and fewer workers to support retirees amid a rising median age is looming large over the Chinese economy.

In 1970, China’s median age was nearly 10 years below that of the U.S. By 2015, it was higher. At the end of 2015, Beijing abandoned its one-child policy -- formally implemented in 1980 amid concerns the population was ballooning too quickly -- but an expected rise in births largely failed to materialize.

In January, the National Bureau of Statistics said China’s population grew to 1.395 billion last year, based on 15.23 million births. That was two million births below the 2017 number and around 30% less than the official forecast for 21 million.

Then, a yearbook recently made available by the National Health Commission put one measure of births in 2018 even lower, at just 13.62 million.

The two government agencies have different methods for counting newborns -- the health commission uses hospital data and the statistics bureau extrapolates from local surveys. Since 2016, the health agency’s birth estimates have generally been slightly higher than the statistics bureau’s. This year, the fact that its number was lower by a wide margin was notable.

The health commission said the data discrepancy was because of different ways of accounting for migrant populations, but didn’t elaborate. The National Bureau of Statistics didn’t reply to faxed questions.

China’s policy makers are well aware that a rising crop of retirees threaten to drain household savings and derail growth. Nonetheless, birth limits remain in place. Couples are now allowed to have two children, but not more than that -- despite the birth numbers and government expectations that the population will start to decline in 2030.

The government has argued that technological advances and automation will increase productivity and solve some of the need for young workers. While officials have also taken steps to encourage more births, they say they are reluctant to change longstanding policies too quickly.

Some demographers say it is too late to reverse the trend: One Chinese researcher said if his calculations are right, China’s population has already started shrinking.

Yi Fuxian, a scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, pieces together birth estimates from other available data, such as the number of childbearing women and school enrollment. Using this method, he has arrived at estimates of only around 10 million births last year and a belief that the population is dropping.

While few demographers have embraced Mr. Yi’s conclusions, many agree the population peak will come sooner than Beijing predicts.

“China will be fine in the next 20 to 30 years but if it can’t solve the demographic problem, it’s going to be in big trouble,” said Huang Wenzheng, a guest researcher at the Center for China and Globalization, a Beijing-based independent think tank. He is also a partner in a hedge-fund firm that invests globally.

Some decline to estimate altogether. Authoritative data can only come from the government, said Liang Zhongtang, a demographer and former adviser to China’s family-planning bureaucracy -- known for its draconian enforcement of the one-child policy, including forced abortions and sterilizations. If the government data isn’t reliable, other estimates, such as Mr. Yi’s, won’t be either, he said.

Mr. Liang said that in the past, the National Bureau of Statistics adjusted the number of newborns to make up for what it believed were missing reports of births from local officials.

Mr. Yi, meanwhile, continues to call on Beijing to abandon all birth limits. “With all the signs pointing to a demographic crisis, there’s no reason for the government to keep controlling births,” he said.

To support his thesis that China inflates its population data, Mr. Yi points to discrepancies between birth and school-enrollment data. In 2000, for example, the statistics bureau put the number of newborns at 17.71 million, but by 2014, middle-school enrollment for 14-year-olds was only 14.26 million. Even taking into consideration infant-mortality rates of around 3% in 2000, that doesn’t account for the big gap. Infant-mortality rates in China in 2018 were 0.61%.

Irregularities in some local data underpin allegations that birth numbers still aren’t reliable. In the southwestern mega-city of Chongqing, the number of newborns dropped 44% in the first five months of 2019, according to figures from the local health authorities. In June, births took an enormous jump, exceeding in one month the total number of the first five months.

Chongqing authorities haven’t explained what caused the large swing and didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Liang predicts a true accounting of births will emerge after one or two more census rounds; China holds the next once-a-decade census next year. “There is no need to fabricate the data anymore,” he said.

-- Liyan Qi and Fanfan Wang

Copyright © 2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

.
.
.