SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rational who wrote (435)1/4/1998 2:09:00 PM
From: Esvida  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9980
 
Geoff and Sankar,

Let me try in my layman's terms. Sankar, please correct me if needed. The subtlety can be measured by the degree of indirectness in how a bribe benefits the receiver.

Plain corruption:
Say we want to apply for an export permit. After paying all the official fees to the government, the 'due process' would take a month. Say we want it faster for our own reasons. The officer who can make the decision to grant us the permit asks for a sum of money to render an expedited service and this money goes directly into his pocket to enrich himself and his cronies.

Subtle corruption:
Scenario just as above, but the officer now says "OK, donate a sum of money to my political party." In this case, we also have to pay extra, but the officer does not benefit directly. It only goes to enrich his party which helps to elect its members - some of them may be in a position to help the officer in some way.

-Al



To: Rational who wrote (435)1/4/1998 2:22:00 PM
From: Geoff Nunn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9980
 
:

< Please explain the meaning of the phrase "subtle corruption."> It will be too long to do so. I know I am running the risk of your not accepting my statement. <G>

Sankar


Sankar, on the contrary I do accept your statement. So, it would appear then that you ran no risk after all, ex post. <G>

Geoff