SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (1964)12/13/2016 11:16:30 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 356760
 
There's no hard evidence that it was NOT a free and fair election...even the FBI and CIA disagree on that point...



To: bentway who wrote (1964)12/13/2016 11:21:45 AM
From: one_less1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Bridge Player

  Respond to of 356760
 
It was not narrow except if you consider only the urban and border regions as representative.

Do we want a government that is representative of only one sector of the population?

It is important to remember that the big population centers of the North East, California, Chicago and maybe some border sections have a very narrow conception of American interests. Sure they have a good idea of what would be in their interests but they fail when it comes to considering the vast interests of the broader America. The broad interests of America are better understood when viewing the counties.








To: bentway who wrote (1964)12/13/2016 3:41:15 PM
From: locogringo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 356760
 
It wasn't a 'free and fair election',

Prove that. Statements without facts backing them up are worthless.

and it was won very narrowly.

306 to 232 is NOT narrow.