SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (126179)12/14/2016 6:20:20 AM
From: bart13  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219700
 
Therefore this is not crappy science it is badly explained science.

The actual IPCC temperature forecasts since the early 1990s are laughable as science. If the theory is correct about CO2 etc, then their magic so-called "scientific" models should not produce such bad & wrong forecasts.



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (126179)12/14/2016 8:16:27 AM
From: Follies  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219700
 
The dioxins don't come from burning petrol or NG, they come from burning trash, pvc, and forest fires and volcanoes. I am all for stopping those activities.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News