SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (988117)12/16/2016 10:42:37 AM
From: Bonefish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570052
 
Fake news from the WSJ



To: Brumar89 who wrote (988117)12/16/2016 11:20:05 AM
From: HPilot2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
TideGlider

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1570052
 
I believe Reince Priebus when he says they were never attacked. I don't even trust the WSJ. So I do not believe the Russians attacked them. Maybe it was Homeland security. They attacked Georgia's site, maybe they thought they were hacking Georgia in Asia? Probably a stupid government lib attacked them but Reince says they did not detect a Russian hack and any lamestream media is almost 100% lies.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (988117)12/16/2016 6:24:37 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Respond to of 1570052
 

Did Putin Direct Russian Hacking? And Other Big Questions Why the fuss now? Who else has been hacked? Could the CIA be wrong?






https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/12/russian-hacking-trump/510689/





Updated on December 16, 2016

What’s the latest?

Intelligence officials have leaked word to NBC and ABC that Russian President Vladimir Putin was “personally involved” in cyberattacks aimed at interfering with the United States presidential election. NBC’s report relies on “two senior officials with direct access to the information,” ABC’s on “U.S. and foreign intelligence officials.” In an interview with NPR on December 15, U.S. President Barack Obama vowed that the U.S. would take action in response, “at a time and place of our own choosing.” He went on: “Mr. Putin is well aware of my feelings about this, because I spoke to him directly about it.”

Didn’t we already know about Russia hacking the Democratic National Committee and others? Why all the fuss?

The newest reports purport to add detail on both actors and intent. Putin personally has not been previously blamed for hacks resulting in leaks damaging to the Clinton campaign, though in October Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stopped just short of doing so, saying that “based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts ... only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.” Secondly, separate intelligence leaks to The New York Times and The Washington Post on December 9 for the first time claimed that the intent of the hacking was to sway the election in favor of Trump, rather than simply sow generalized distrust. It has not yet been suggested that cyberattacks managed to change the actual vote tally in favor of either presidential candidate.

Information on what exactly happened has been dripping out slowly, and often anonymously and unofficially, for months. Way back in mid-June, the Democratic National Committee reported an intrusion into its computer network, and the cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike publicly blamed Russian hackers after analyzing the breach. In July, after emails stolen from the committee appeared on WikiLeaks, Democratic members of congress also blamed the Russians, with Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook alleging that “It was the Russians who perpetrated this leak for the purpose of helping Donald Trump and hurting Hillary Clinton.”