SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lokness who wrote (2555)12/16/2016 5:27:48 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 361423
 
That is pretty naïve Steve. Number one, Trump absolutely saw those people as suckers. When in Trumps entire life did he ever do anything for that group? Number two, nobody is twisting anything, Trump is as dangerous as you think he is and more so probably.

Look at his cabinet picks and tell me people are twisting anything.

The reason I say he is even more dangerous, is because he is the type of person that the more power you give him the more dangerous he becomes. And he is too clueless to keep from pushing it to the edge.

Bankrupt four times

Trump is a solid existential threat to the entire world. Trump could start a nuclear war. He is that type of person (Asian idea--lol)

<<

<<< No, I'm not. I'm insulting Trump - When Trump spoke to a crowd, he saw suckers, marks,>>>

Certainly Hillary did. If Trump thinks of them as "suckers" that will come back to bite him in a bad way. We will have to see. The Carrier thing suggest he does have their interest at heart. He went after a corporate entity backing the worker instead.

I'm not a Trump fan, you know that. But what is driving me crazy now is the democrat elite trying to twist reality into some convoluted alternate truth. From Hillary to Krugman they refuse to look at the truth and by continuing to do that they will only accomplish to spin a few more States to conservatives. Man up Krugman! Accept that the elite screwed up and stop blaming people for how they voted. Geez! You don't get the results you want - you get actual votes tallies as made by ordinary people.



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (2555)12/16/2016 6:24:36 PM
From: Ron  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361423
 
Absolutely nothing wrong with blaming people for the way they voted. It's a Democracy. Voting and credit and blame are part of the mix... as long as we have freedom of speech....
I don't see that Clinton played anyone for suckers. Clinton is a very smart, accomplished woman. She is also a lousy campaigner. She and her team made some obvious mistakes. Trump on the other hand is the best carnival barker we've had in awhile. Probably the best since Reagan.. who took dog whistle politics to new heights.
Clinton was too hawkish for me, but compared to Trump she was by far the best choice, and I had no problem voting for her.