Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (126358)	12/17/2016 10:03:13 AM
From: Alex MG	Respond to of 217518

W/r to the spy drone that the us navy lost, which the us media tried to characterise as a oceanic research device used by civilians (contractors) even though a us navy trip tried to retrieve it, am wondering why team USA even trying to denying the obvious. Given that it is a civilian research drone, then let the civilian try to claim it. From what I read it is not reported as a civilian drone. I guess a spy story is more exciting. Who knows, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Not everything is a conspiracy. W/r to Trump, unfortunately he is not pretending. Obviously your daughter would be more presidential than what we are currently stuck with. "The UUV was lawfully conducting a military survey in the waters of the South China Sea," a U.S. official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "It's a sovereign immune vessel, clearly marked in English not to be removed from the water - that it was U.S. property," the official said. The Pentagon confirmed the incident at a news briefing on Friday, and said the drone used commercially available technology and sold for about $150,000.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (126358)	12/17/2016 2:11:35 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217518

The drones are 3-D mapping the terrain of the sea bed West of the Philippines. The updated 3D maps, when uploaded into military ships, make it extremely easy to find things which are new and shouldn't be there - like one of the 70 Chinese Naval submarines. The new Chinese 93-B nuclear submarine is far quieter than the 93 (093), and the coming 95 is expected to quieter still. en.wikipedia.org So tracking new Chinese submarines will rely less on direction finding the noise they generate and rely more on sonar detection which requires an accurate 3D map of the background seabed to spot the subs. The US Navy began mapping the seabed decades ago to be able to more easily spot Russian submarines, but this area of seabed has become more important with the 93-B. The drones are nothing special the Chinese can't also purchase on the open market. When the Chinese military downloads the information, it will merely reveal what area of the seabed the drone had been mapping, along with the data collected. That area will simply be mapped by another drone. The area where this took place is much too far from China to think the drone had mapped the seabed of Chinese territorial waters, although I'd have to assume that's done as well. It's also reasonable to assume the seabed in the region has a large number of long-lived passive listening devices to track submarines, some of them Americans and some of them Chinese.