Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : American International Petroleum Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Laserbones who wrote (6244)	1/4/1998 4:23:00 PM
From: sand wedge	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11888

The original intent of this forum was to post and exchange ideas and information. If this is true, then it wouldn't be unreasonable to think that, over time, peoples opinions or strategies may change based on the information they pick up or the new and additional moves the company does or doesn't make?. (I'm not saying that Greg's did or not, btw) My point is that there seems to be a line drawn in the sand and your either on this side or that, a permabull or a snert (i love that one in particular). This is just ridiculous, especially when it evolves into personal attacks or shades someones perception to such a point that white appears to be black and vice versa. A number of people have questioned my stance here. I echo Greg and qdog in that while this is a speculative stock at best, I like alot of things. Having said that, there are many things that either make me nervous or just dont add up. Asking questions then, is a reasonable thing to do to fill in these gaps. Yet, asking questions here or on any other thread involving this stock immediately brands you. I refuse to blindly go along with the pack. One can be in the stock and not be a fanatic or a "short". One can go from being a trader to holding for months or years. All of this based on info one learns from here and other places. Sorry for the rant