Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HPilot who wrote (988969)	12/19/2016 12:13:05 PM
From: Sdgla	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Respond to of 1568979

What's there to expose out of the GOP emails ? They knew Hillary wasn't up in the polls because their internals showed differently ? Meanwhile proof of what we all already knew out of Hilda's hack : 99% of the media was being paid by the Clintons DNC. Benghazi wasn't the result of a YouTube video. Hillary set up an illegal unsecured server to hide her foundation op. Bill C met with AG Lynch to cement the payoff that insured no grand jury would be convened. Hillary didn't hold a press conference for the entire year because her meds weren't working. Hillary didn't go to flyover country because she was scared shitless of deplorables.

To: HPilot who wrote (988969)	12/19/2016 8:11:48 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1568979

You've drank the Orange Koolaid. Hey I believe Reince when he says that they had no attempts on their system. He said they had detection software and NOBODY tried to hack. Why would the RNC be exempt from hacking? NOBODY even tried? NOBODY? That's hard to believe. The WSJ story sounds like a teen age spy novel. Do you really think they would use the name BIG BEAR? Russia WANTS people to know. They're into intimidation. It's why their jets have buzzed America ships. Wait, to you that's probably fake news too. Don't believe anything not reported by RT. *WSJ:* RNC cybersecurity foiled hacking attempt by Russians Can't be. Russia says they haven't tried to hack anyone and if you can't believe them who can you believe? Fake news from the WSJ./sarc YOU said they were never even attacked at all (meaning there was no Russian hacking attempt - because even a hacking attempt is an attack) and that the WSJ printed fake news: I believe Reince Priebus when he says they were never attacked. I don't even trust the WSJ. So I do not believe the Russians attacked them. Maybe it was Homeland security. They attacked Georgia's site, maybe they thought they were hacking Georgia in Asia? Probably a stupid government lib attacked them but Reince says they did not detect a Russian hack and any lamestream media is almost 100% lies So there you are ... YOU trust Russia and you believe them ... just like I said sarcastically, you and Reince don't publicly accept that Trump's Russian friends even try to hack computer systems. The Trump Truth is Russia doesn't do that. That Orange Koolaid is powerful stuff ... it turns Republicans into Russophiles. MakeRussiaGreatAgain Don't believe anything RT doesn't report. OTOH, maybe they figured the Russian moles provided enough info. After all, the one thing the Trump team bothered to change in the Republican platform was one calling for military weapons to be provided to Ukraine. Team Trump had Russian operatives IN the organization. It was and is compromised totally.