Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SYNTEL (SYNT) - Upcoming Year 2000 IPO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TokyoMex who wrote (657)	1/4/1998 5:27:00 PM
From: Mike Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2761

Joe 6-pack, I have a good laugh at your childish analysis of SYNT. I could never compete with CK. She is a dedicated Yahoo-Search-Copy-Paste expert. I could rebut her by posting the biography of Tom Kurlack, a well known analyst at ML, but I have better things to do than gluing in front of a terminal. This guy also has an impressive biography, had worked in some type of marketing management position at Intel, is a powerful analyst at ML. But his record is awful. He completely over-estimated the demand of DRAM and therefore was way off on MU. He estimated something like 0.75 for earnings and the rest of the analysts estimated something like 0.35-0.50. Anyhow, all the analysts came out wrong and MU earnings was quite sh*tty last quarter - I forgot what the number was. He also flip-flopped on Intel, upraded one week and downgraded the next week. But people still listen to him. Sorry to divert from the subject of SYNT but my point is don't always trust the words of the so-called experts. And don't trust me either. Read the research articles and all the posts on SI and analyze them to see if they make sense logically. SYNT has revenue and earnings and the record speaks for itself. Mike.