Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (512)	1/5/1998 8:17:00 PM
From: Jack Clarke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4711

Janice, That "I be" structure you mentioned as part of southern and especially black dialect is terribly misunderstood and erroneously parodied. Many times it reflects an imperfect type tense, repetitive action, usually in the past, and the auxiliary just gets left out. Example, doctor interviewing patient: Doctor: What are you usually doing when you get that pain in your back? Patient: Doctah, heah's wat happens. Ah be comin' home from th' fiel' of an evenin', an' wen ah crawl undah dat fence, dat's wen it hits me! Dialect aside, you or I might utilize the same construction, but with clearer enunciation and without the omission of the auxiliary. "After a long day, I'll be coming home from work, and I start thinking about my bills." Drop the 'll and you've got your "I be". Stephen Foster, who never visited the South, I am told, deserves blame for misconstruing dialect in his songs. "Skeeters am a-hummin' on the honeysuckle vine". Ridiculous. Nobody ever used "am" as a third person singular. Lots of "I is" and "you is", sure, but never "he am". This is too deep a subject to go into any further/farther here. Jack