Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James Seagrove who wrote (126762)	12/21/2016 6:34:03 PM
From: louel	1 Recommendation Recommended By James Seagrove Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217573

There is nothing Native about her. Asked to reveal her ancestral linage she could not. Politically Pandering to the Native population. Offensive. Native American Warbonnets were important ceremonial regalia worn only by chiefs and warriors. Only men wore warbonnets. The right to wear a head dress or War bonnet had to be earned. It was for great respect which was given to a Chief or by outstanding bravery of a warrior. However the Chief always had the most feathers. Women sometimes went to war in some Plains Indian tribes, and there were even some female chiefs, but they never wore these masculine headdresses. Women did use headbands with long fringes and a feather or two attached to one or the other side, And sometimes ringed with fur. So for her to pander for votes wearing a Mans head dress shows her total ignorance of the culture. The left wing does not even mention this Far more Racist than Trump eating that Taco for lunch. but they were all over that for weeks. Indian ? Sh