SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (3187)12/22/2016 4:42:13 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 357140
 
I guess the Constitution may have flaws.

The other day, I commented somewhere on the unbelievable prescience the Framers had for providing the Electoral College to prevent a few centralized population centers (New York City, Chicago, all of California, etc.) from being able to control the presidential election process. It would be much simpler today to just count the votes. But to do so would undoubtedly result in the collapse of the Union.

There really isn't anyone today I would trust to "fix" our constitution. I know brilliant people who simply could not see that problem coming. They had to fight back very strong tendencies, and they did it in multiple ways (the Convention of States provision in Article V is another astoundingly thoughtful provision that I cannot imagine anyone dreaming up today).

I tend to think they typically got it right. There was no need for them to define it.



To: neolib who wrote (3187)12/22/2016 6:40:17 PM
From: Lane31 Recommendation

Recommended By
one_less

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 357140
 
because it uses a term it never defines "Natural born citizen". How nutty can you get?

Huh? The Constitution defines natural born citizen, no? There are three ways to become a citizen. Two of them involved being born. The other is being naturalized. So, natural born citizen is the former two.