Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (989899)	12/23/2016 9:50:45 AM
From: rxbond	4 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo steve harris TideGlider tntpal Respond to of 1575167

We are destroying ourselves far worse then the planet. That's where our focus should be. The planet has been here for billion of years in far worse conditions and has lived through life changing conditions and threats. The notion that the industrial revolution will destroy it is beyond comprehension.

To: steve harris who wrote (989899)	12/23/2016 12:32:05 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo steve harris Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575167

>> To be clear, I don't deny the climate is changing. The fraud is that it's manmade. I don't deny it is changing, but I do deny it is changing as much as the Warmists think it is. We're not seeing nearly the temperature change they are claiming. In fact, the true change is more like 10% of what they project at IPCC. It has at times been a conspiracy IMO. But having NASA in the business of providing these "adjusted" data is not a healthy thing. Because that puts them in a position to justify more money, and without those adjustments the data are simply not so compelling. Climate changes all the time.