Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: louel who wrote (126968)	12/23/2016 5:58:40 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 217543

There ain't no getting use to nuclear weapons. I posted to you that the statisticians say that if we have them we will use them. So I guess we will use them. You do understand that if we get in a nuclear war with either China or Russia pretty much everyone dies. As far as the white race goes, I believe in mixing the races up and so does biology. They call it hybrid vigor. The more you mix them up, the stronger everyone gets. As the people get educated, births decrease. If you educate the world, the population will decline. We can't be doing things like sterilizing people, or hoping for a nuclear war to cut our population down. The minute we abandon our humanity for quick and easy solutions, we won't have any humanity left. You're going to see Trump's policies devoid of humanity for the next four years and I think you will be horrified when you actually see it.

To: louel who wrote (126968)	12/23/2016 6:31:14 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 217543

Re <<Nuclear Weaponry will never leave until something more powerful comes into play. Get used to it.>> ... am guessing genetically engineered weapon systems. the advantage being the infrastructure is left standing Re <<... Today, at the beginning of the 21st century, LESS than ten percent (10%) of the earth’s population is still of essentially WhiteEuropean racial stock. The figure is currently estimated at 7%.>> ... perhaps it is a better forward strategy to build a second cairo rather than creating another failed-state. the problem w/ genetically engineered WMD is that (i) it may not require much expensive infrastructure, and (ii) it could be a simple numbers gaming making aggregate groups of people angrier is typically not a good idea, given sustainability and efficacy, risk / reward considerations watch & brief, but not much can be done, not even by trump or putin.