Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockMan who wrote (27617)	1/4/1998 11:40:00 PM
From: Craig Freeman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570294

Stockman, please leave the CYRX thread. You are making an A*S of yourself. Craig

To: StockMan who wrote (27617)	1/5/1998 5:50:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman	Respond to of 1570294

On January 3rd, 1997 "Stockman" posted this on the CYRX/NSM thread. Small Bucks, Re -- CPU manufacturers this year, for now I am out of all of them. You should buy Intel now. Things have never been as bright, with NSM completely confused as to their future direction. Cyrix unable to produce and sell and profit from any of their chips. The count down to the demise of NSM as a company has begun. Brian Halla, who was just a low level manager at Intel (Intel has many more Brian Halla's) can't even hope to compete. NSM should dump cyrix, and work on their speciality of providing $1 chips for the wireless and networking business. Stockman

To: StockMan who wrote (27617)	1/5/1998 5:52:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman	Respond to of 1570294

On January 3rd, 1997 "Stockman" posted this on the CYRX/NSM thread. Stockman Small Bucks, Re -- Aren't you worried about earnings not meeting analyst expectations for Q4 and the year? Two analysts raised their Q4 estimates for Intel, and one said Intel is likely to meet estimates. Rather People are more concerned with NSM. This DOG of a company, had Book to Bill of 1, and with the slow down in Asian markets coming into play this Q. I would be more worried about this dog. Stockman

To: StockMan who wrote (27617)	1/5/1998 5:54:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman	Respond to of 1570294

On January 3rd, 1997 "Stockman" posted this on the CYRX/NSM thread. Jimmy OLD chap, Re -- Stockman seems to think you have to sell a chip for $268 in order to be profitable. Obviously as shown on the Intel thread, you have absolutely no idea about markets and supply/demand. You should go sit in your rocker and not involve yourself in such things as Investing/trading. Jimmy old boy. Leave the investing to people who know about it. Stockman

To: StockMan who wrote (27617)	1/5/1998 5:54:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman	Respond to of 1570294

On January 3rd, 1997 "Stockman" posted this on the CYRX/NSM thread. All NSMites, You guys should abandon ship here, and invest in the bellweather Intel. After all cyrix has always had inferior products, and now their are coming up with one which is worse, the mxi. They still can't get their 6x86 chips anywhere near even AMD's clock rates. Speaking of which, AMD cleaned their clock, and you have invested in such a looser. Says what you guys are. Stockman

To: StockMan who wrote (27617)	1/5/1998 5:55:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman	Respond to of 1570294

On January 3rd, 1997 "Stockman" posted this on the CYRX/NSM thread. Prophet who hasn't seen the 15 year trend line of Intel,AMD and NSM. Thus who lost his shirt and mind on AMD speaks!!

To: StockMan who wrote (27617)	1/5/1998 5:56:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570294

On January 3rd, 1997 "Stockman" posted this on the CYRX/NSM thread. No Bucks, Re -- That's about a "9" on the tension scale there fella, have you lost your sense of humor? I see you are enamoured with your tiny brains. NSM is going to be trading in the teens. Which means LOSSES for those who have faithfully held Cyrix shares all these years. I guess, LOSERS will be LOSERS!! This thread is littered with them. While they could have made lots of money investing in Intel. Stockman

To: StockMan who wrote (27617)	1/5/1998 5:57:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman	Respond to of 1570294

On January 3rd, 1997 "Stockman" posted this on the CYRX/NSM thread. Dick, Re -- Gilder states that the ultimate systems on a chip must contain analog devices and that NSM a world analog leader. Yeah right, he conveniently forgot to mention Motorola. NSM is history guys. They are completely confused about which business they are in. The Mxi is an utter tragedy. We should see them make 200 Mhz of these things, According to Jimmy OLD chap, Mhz sells. Thus they will be instantly behind the curve, and loosing more money. The BOD of NSM will dump Brian Halla and that LOSER cyrix soon. Stockman

To: StockMan who wrote (27617)	1/5/1998 5:58:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman	Respond to of 1570294

On January 3rd, 1997 "Stockman" posted this on the CYRX/NSM thread. No Bucks, NSM is going down the drain buddy. Is NSM going to use that PRCrap rating on the Mxitoo? A failure from the start. No wonder those Cyrix dudes sold out to NSM. Next step the BOOT from NSM. Stockman

To: StockMan who wrote (27617)	1/5/1998 6:04:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570294

Stockman, if your really believe that "You guys should abandon ship here, and invest in the bellweather Intel." then why bother posting on the AMD thread? Craig