Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (3588)	12/26/2016 8:00:42 PM
From: combjelly	2 Recommendations Recommended By bentway Sam Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361376

I agree that they were two different things. If only because Hillary was doing no such thing. What would make it more believable is if she derived some sort of benefit. Like Trump did with his self-dealing. But she didn't. Not to mention, you are mis-stating what occurred. It wasn't just a matter of something not being accounted for correctly. He clearly was using his foundation as his personal piggy bank. On numerous occasions. He used it to bribe a government official and to pay legal damages incurred by his other businesses. And then there is the issue of Linda McMahon giving a large donation and then being appointed to the head of the SBA. Hillary never did anything remotely like that.