Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BeanCounter who wrote (29606)	1/4/1998 9:35:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 35569

So, you want to read about chickens and eggs? O.K. - What came first the Chicken or the Egg. So, Mr. Bean F do you want to have heard that IPM management capulated to Demands of that nameless consultant who wantyed a big piece of dillution to do the extraction on a reproducable constant that was secret and untold? This company doing the SFA stuff ( not Stan at FM) was a tough negiotater, BUT I paid those bills -so to speak, and I am concerned. Did he withohold our solutionm, an early Modified Fir Assay?? At Higher Numbers?? Because they were tied to some augmentation or INCREASE in Extraction, yes, that is possible. Not gunna get over obnoxious, but management saved me some bucks, I know not how many but I didn't want a person who changes a contract MID STREAM at IPM as consultant to do the new Fire Assay to PROFIT by that way. That is not proper, either. Why, do you personally hit every chance you get at Management of IPM..don't you see any protection of assets, any step by step..even baby steps. I know I was a gorilla, but you sir, were always, something else-that way. As C of L would allways say: Best To U. ChucasaysBesttoyoutoVooDoo?