Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (991270)	1/1/2017 8:53:03 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573920

how do error bars on GISS measurements have any relevance (sic) to the error bars calculated for the GCM. They just illustrate how much that is TOTAL BULLSHIT. You see that the alleged error bars in the GCM model for corresponding data points that you present are 10-20x the size of the error in the measurement. You do understand the consequences of a 10 C drop in global surface temperature don't you? It's firstly impossible in such a short term as in your presented time frame (especially since the author is suggesting it would be caused by cloud forcing effect). That's what your uncertainty bars are suggesting as possible. So you can take your misleading scam "analysis" (and your idiot animated gifs) and shove it. BTW, numerous papers have been written illustrating that there's no significant forcing effect of clouds (i.e. neutral).