Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (991300)	1/2/2017 2:15:12 AM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1570563

>> And if you go back to 1850 it adds up up to MANY TRILLIONS of Tonnes. Well, the actual figure I think is closer to 30 Billion. But it hasn't always been that. I would really avoid any "information" coming from sources such as "Slate", though. If you really want the truth you have to look at established sources who have been willing to be honest, not those for whom it is religion (complete with "do as I say, not as I do!") There are a lot of factors at work, but just keep in mind that in the worst-case scenario these rates only reach back a few decades. Before that it just really wasn't an issue at all. As a result, the a trillion is probably high, but trillion(s) certainly would be. I'll agree that it is easier just to go along with what the far left is saying. But if you actually look at the science you just can't get there from here. It is really worth studying, IMO. An interesting lesson in how science becomes politics.