Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (991388)	1/2/2017 3:26:45 PM
From: longnshort	5 Recommendations Recommended By Bearcatbob PKRBKR POKERSAM Stan Stock Puppy Respond to of 1574050

follow the money Dr. Duane Thresher, a climate scientist with a PhD from Columbia University and NASA GISS, has pointed to “publication and funding bias” as a key to understanding how scientific consensus can be manipulated. Although scientists are held up as models of independent thinkers and unbiased seekers of truth, the reality is that they depend on funding even more than other professions, since much of their research has no market value. Thus, they will study what they are funded to study.

To: i-node who wrote (991388)	1/2/2017 4:29:44 PM
From: James Seagrove	1 Recommendation Recommended By i-node Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574050

No amount of money is going to fix or change climate. The AGW-crowd need wisdom but of course that will never happen. “God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference." The look on Koan's face when he realized he lacked wisdom.

To: i-node who wrote (991388)	1/2/2017 4:54:49 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Respond to of 1574050

Climate Change Skeptics Welcome Open Debate Under Trump Presidency Nodey, I've asked this question several times over the last two weeks......why have the conservatives made science, ie climate change, a political issue. What political issue does it fall under??? Where are the political experiments being done? Where is the political data being gathered? I would guess 95% of conservatives fall mindlessly in lock step with the deniers. What kind of debate would you propose....someone faked the data??