Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : JAB International (JABI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jamey who wrote (2492)	1/5/1998 4:33:00 AM
From: Ryan Weisman	Respond to of 4571

James, with all due respect, I am just trying to open up a conversation about what is going on at the mines. I have been extremely excited about the prospects up there, and that hasn't changed. But there are some "facts" that I feel are a concern to all of us; if they are untrue, and I don't know, I am looking for someone to refute them. Since there are no production #'s, we must use all outlying factors to develop a picture of what is happening...disclaimer...the above statement does not mean I want them to rush out #'s to appease us. Again, I will state things I have read which concern me, because they are counterindicative to what I originally thought... Pillar #4 began production on 12/15? That's three weeks after I (and many others on the thread) thought. Is this correct? I don't know. The roof needed repair. The ore graters need to be replaced. The shakers are still warped. I didn't know about the first two problems, and I was under the impression that the third was easily taken care of. Again, maybe these are minor difficulties. Brian was able to state this. Did BCMD pay Cambridge?!?!? I really didn't imagine that when I read the report. If this is true, then I don't think it is negative to warn others that this is far from kosher, considering that it is the only analyst report out there. <<< I can't understand, if you are truly a stockholder, why you would express all of this negativity based on a guru type of approach. This is exactly the type of mislesding information that causes less experienced investors to pass on BCMD or sell>>> Again, with all due respect, you didn't respond to any of my concerns, so why reply? Should all our concerns be whitewashed because we own shares, and want others to buy so the price rises. Others should be cautious, and if the fundamentals aren't there why should I want someone else to buy. Furthermore, I didn't write anything misleading; considering I was more asking than telling, misleading would be a difficult thing.