Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Beaver Lodge -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elpolvo who wrote (1253)	1/6/2017 11:45:19 PM
From: abuelita	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2933

i un-subject-marked the thread for my own well being. i did the same. what took you so long? :)

To: elpolvo who wrote (1253)	1/7/2017 6:03:21 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2933

Yes I know BUT so many of my posts were on remaining civil... directed at both sides.. jallen/Land Shark for example.. The thread header is unfortunately a predictor of the moderator bias.. and it is OK for the moderator to have a bias.. we all do.. However if you claim your thread to be free thinking.. make it so.. I understand Sioux's and Epicure's points which are clearly stated in their respective headers... There was a time when I rejected those ideals... but not now... I understand completely ... and they are totally forthright ... It is UP TO me to moderate myself... Frankly I feel 80-90% comfy on Sioux's thread.. Likely Epicure's also ... so I manage myself accordingly :) I do not feel I merited a ban as a *trouble maker* (gave me a good chuckle) but yes bentway's thread.. his header though is disingenuous in my opinion... but that is life... Actually it is easier to behave on Sioux's thread... I just need to realise that I am a Canuck and that the Dems pretty well cover the brunt of the Canuck political spectrum :))